模板:Academic-written review：修订间差异
UJNWiki>Boghog （added name-list-style pass through parameter） |
小 （导入1个版本） |
（没有差异）
| |
2023年5月28日 (日) 00:55的最新版本
The 错误：无效时间。 version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in {{#property:P1433|from=}} and can be cited as: "Academic-written review". {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help) |
.svg){kind=link}
Usage
This template is based off the Academic Peer Reviewed template and is meant for Wikipedia articles updated as part of a dual publication model used by journals to incentivize scholarly contributions to Wikipedia. Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the Wikipedia version to the community at large.
{{Academic-written review
| wikidate = date (year) of update by review article author
| journal = name of journal (can include wikilink)
| title =
| author =
| date = publication date of corresponding review
| volume =
| issue =
| pages =
| pmid = pmid number
| doi = identifier only
| pmc = pmc id without the leading 'PMC'
| url = url to open access page if available
}}
Example with QID
{{Academic-written review|Q = Q38916407}}
Produces:
The 错误：无效时间。 version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in {{#property:P1433|from=Q38916407}} and can be cited as: Lua错误 在package.lua的第80行：module 'Module:i18n' not found |
Example without QID
{{Academic-written review
| wikidate = 2016
| journal = [[Gene (journal)|Gene]]
| title = {{#property:P1476|from=Q38916407}}
| author = {{#property:P2093|from=Q38916407}}
| date = {{#property:P577|from=Q38916407}}
| volume = {{#property:P478|from=Q38916407}}
| issue = {{#property:P433|from=Q38916407}}
| pages = {{#property:P304|from=Q38916407}}
| doi = {{#property:P356|from=Q38916407}}
| pmid = {{#property:P698|from=Q38916407}}
| pmc = {{#property:P932|from=Q38916407}}
}}
Produces:
The 2016 version of this article was updated by an external expert under a dual publication model. The corresponding academic peer reviewed article was published in Gene and can be cited as: {{#property:P2093|from=Q38916407}} ({{#property:P577|from=Q38916407}}). "{{#property:P1476|from=Q38916407}}". Gene. {{#property:P478|from=Q38916407}} ({{#property:P433|from=Q38916407}}): {{#property:P304|from=Q38916407}}. doi:{{#property:P356|from=Q38916407}}. PMC {{#property:P932|from=Q38916407}}. PMID {{#property:P698|from=Q38916407}}. {{cite journal}}: Check |doi= value (help); Check |pmc= value (help); Check |pmid= value (help); Check date values in: |date= (help) |
Caveats
Note that this template transcludes the Cite Journal Template, and inherits one of the weaknesses/issues of said template. The author list must be formatted in a certain way or it will give errors when using the {{{vauthors}}} parameter. If you use this template and populate it with info pulled from Wikidata, it will not format the author list in a way compatible with {{{vauthors}}}. Rather than have each use of the template raise an error, this template uses the {{{authors}}} instead. Unfortunately, the use of this parameter is discouraged because it does not contribute to a citation's metadata, and users consuming cs1|2 citations via the metadata will find that the citation is missing authors.
Categories for pages using these templates
- Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding academic peer reviewed articles
- Category:Wikipedia articles with corresponding articles published in {{{journal}}}
See also
{{Academic peer reviewed}}- a similar template for articles, where content has been published in a peer reviewed journal{{External peer review}}- a similar template for articles reviewed externally but not full academic peer review